Aside from the occasional complaints about online writing habits debasing the language, most folk seem to feel comfortable enough with English language usage going with whatever flow takes it -- or whatever regional variations (in the UK and US, as well as many of Britain's former colonies) develop.
Elsewhere, linguistic watchdogs aren't anywhere near as comfortable with allowing much freedom -- hence the French with their language police (and, most recently, getting all up in arms over yet another English-language-takeover threat; see, for example, Angelique Chrisafis reporting on French academia in war of words over plan to teach in English).
In The Hindu Rama Kant Agnihotri argues that: 'The idea that a tongue spoken by a large number of people across a territory is 'pure' and therefore must not be changed is wrong' in Stories they tell about languages, suggesting widely held views on the sacrosanctity of languages -- such as Sanskrit and Hindi -- are entirely and damagingly misguided.
In The Hindu Rama Kant Agnihotri argues that: 'The idea that a tongue spoken by a large number of people across a territory is 'pure' and therefore must not be changed is wrong' in Stories they tell about languages, suggesting widely held views on the sacrosanctity of languages -- such as Sanskrit and Hindi -- are entirely and damagingly misguided.